| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Brf
Joined: 07 Nov 2004
Posts: 3754
Location: Belvidere, Illinois
|
| Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2006 9:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
You put them in their groups from the User Groups link. Everyone goes in TWG Alive unless they are dead or jailed (sick in this game). The Wolves or Masons also go in their respective groups, so they can see their forums.
The TWG Tickets will put them in the Alive group automatically, so GMs dont need to worry about that detail anymore, |
|
| Back to top |
|
bannie
Joined: 22 Mar 2005
Posts: 1966
Location: Boston
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 12, 2006 9:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ok, I just go this idea so Im gonna throw it out here
ok, follow me with this: Instead of voting for one person to lynch, you vote for two. Both are given a choice. A or B. One of those choices leads to death, the other safety. If they both choose A, they both die, if both B, they both live and if they each choose differently, one dies, and one lives
what do you think? Will it add an element of uncertainty or could it make the games too short/too long? |
|
| Back to top |
|
Darkness
Joined: 25 May 2005
Posts: 1895
Location: Rotterdam, Netherlands
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 12, 2006 11:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| and who decides whether its A or B that leads to a lynch? |
|
| Back to top |
|
crispybacon
Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 1012
Location: Somewhere between the stove and your plate
|
| Posted: Sun Nov 12, 2006 11:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think bannie is saying that THEY do.
For example, the two players pick A or B. What happens is either:
AA: Both die
BB: Both live
AB: A lives, B dies
BA: B dies, A lives
or something like that. It looks like Rock-Paper-Scissors TWG. In my opinion, worth a try.
________
LOVE QUOTES FORUMS |
|
| Back to top |
|
Darkness
Joined: 25 May 2005
Posts: 1895
Location: Rotterdam, Netherlands
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 13, 2006 12:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think it would be more fun to actually use the rock-paper-scissors method then. But that means both lynchees should be around at lynch-time, which isnt very workable in forum-games.
Unless you extend everyday as long as it needs to be to get all your information, but that could make it more tedious than fun. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Brf
Joined: 07 Nov 2004
Posts: 3754
Location: Belvidere, Illinois
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 13, 2006 6:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
crispybacon wrote: I think bannie is saying that THEY do.
For example, the two players pick A or B. What happens is either:
AA: Both die
BB: Both live
AB: A lives, B dies
BA: B dies, A lives
That is the old conundrum, "Would you die, to let your brother live?"
Choosing to die (B) guarantees your brother lives. If he chooses to live (A), then he lives and you die. If He chooses to die (B), then you both live. |
|
| Back to top |
|
crispybacon
Joined: 10 Jul 2006
Posts: 1012
Location: Somewhere between the stove and your plate
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 13, 2006 10:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
It brings an element of psychology into the game. We all know each other's playing style fairly well, but how well do we know the person behind the avatar?
________
Dc Medical Marijuana Dispensaries |
|
| Back to top |
|
Brf
Joined: 07 Nov 2004
Posts: 3754
Location: Belvidere, Illinois
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 13, 2006 11:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Also.... if the other player is your enemy, the question reverses to:
"Would you risk your life to guarantee the death of your enemy?"
If you choose "Yes" (A), then your enemy is guaranteed to die.
So with either question...
If you choose "A", the other player dies.
If you choose "B", the other player lives. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Darkness
Joined: 25 May 2005
Posts: 1895
Location: Rotterdam, Netherlands
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 13, 2006 11:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
| but you dont know whether the other person is a friend or an enemy |
|
| Back to top |
|
Brf
Joined: 07 Nov 2004
Posts: 3754
Location: Belvidere, Illinois
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 13, 2006 11:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
Darkness wrote: but you dont know whether the other person is a friend or an enemy
You might. Especially if you are both Wolves or both Masons. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Darkness
Joined: 25 May 2005
Posts: 1895
Location: Rotterdam, Netherlands
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 13, 2006 12:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| i dont think i will be able to play a game like that |
|
| Back to top |
|
bannie
Joined: 22 Mar 2005
Posts: 1966
Location: Boston
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 13, 2006 2:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thats why I am throwing the idea out into the open, so we can discuss it and refine it
The way I see it, it wouldnt prolong the days. The two chosen would be in the box so they would essentially be out of the game until they both make a descision |
|
| Back to top |
|
NibbyCat
Joined: 07 Nov 2004
Posts: 3203
Location: Eastern Ohio
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 13, 2006 3:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Wait, the general population would EACH vote for two people? Or just one? and the two with the highest number of votes then duke it out, right? |
|
| Back to top |
|
bannie
Joined: 22 Mar 2005
Posts: 1966
Location: Boston
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 13, 2006 4:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Yup, each person votes for two people, then the two selected vote on their fates |
|
| Back to top |
|
Brf
Joined: 07 Nov 2004
Posts: 3754
Location: Belvidere, Illinois
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 13, 2006 6:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
bannie wrote: then the two selected vote on their fates
Or decide the other person's fate, as it were. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |